ProjectsAirspace & Procedures

Major Airspace
Restructure.

Nation-scale modernisation of an entire country's airspace and procedural framework. A multi-year programme delivered with the regulator, every air navigation service provider in the country, the major airlines, the military, and the airports.

Region
Middle East
Discipline
Airspace & Procedures
Duration
Multi-year programme
Status
In operational use

Illustrative . regional operating environment

The brief

Modernise a country's airspace without interrupting the traffic inside it.

The host country was approaching the ceiling of what its legacy airspace could absorb. Procedures had aged out of the era of paper strips and conventional navigation. Sector boundaries had calcified around fleets and route structures that no longer matched the traffic flowing through them. The mandate was clear: bring the entire system, end to end, into a contemporary, performance-based shape.

GANS was engaged as the lead delivery partner. The remit covered new Performance-Based Navigation arrivals (STARs) and departures (SIDs), holds, instrument approach procedures, and missed approach procedures. It covered additional approach sectors inside the CTA so peak-hour load could be split across more controllers. And it covered the readiness path that gets controllers, dispatchers, and airline operations comfortable with the change before the cutover, not after.

Every part of the system was touched. Every stakeholder had to be brought along. Nothing could break in the meantime.

The story

The engagement began the way most national-scale aviation programmes do: not with a clean sheet, but with a busy one. Traffic was still climbing, the regulator was already anticipating the next inspection cycle, and the airlines had fleet refreshes on the horizon that the existing procedures could not absorb. The brief landed in that environment.

GANS led the technical design and then ran the validation, but the work was always going to be larger than either of those roles. Designing new arrivals and departures means negotiating with the airlines whose fleets will fly them. Splitting an Approach sector means rewriting the letters of agreement that govern who hands what to whom and where. Adding holds means rewriting parts of the controller training pack. Every change touched another change.

The team worked through it the same way the team handles every programme of this scale: in phases, with stand-by procedures ready at each gate, and with the regulator briefed on the failure modes before they could happen.

The most visible work happened in the final phase, where the full system was rehearsed end to end. Controllers ran the new procedures alongside the old ones in mixed scenarios. Dispatchers practised the new routings. Airline operations centres were briefed and re-briefed. The fast-time simulation stress-tested traffic flow at network level so the cutover did not surface anything that could have been caught beforehand.

When the procedures went live, controller readiness was the point that took the most quiet effort. Over two and a half months, every air traffic control officer in the host country had received e-learning packages tailored to the change. Approach controllers, who carry most of the operational risk during cutover, had spent additional hours in the simulator on the specific traffic patterns they were about to inherit.

By the time the new airspace went operational, no one was seeing it for the first time. That, more than any single piece of procedure design, is what carried the cutover.

Working draft . content team to refine

The scale

Numbers from the final phase.

Figures marked “Sourced from gans.aero” are taken from the original record. Others are placeholders for the content team to verify.

10,000+
Hours, final phase alone

Sourced from gans.aero

03
Real-time simulations

Two run outside the host country

2.5 mo.
Controller training

E-learning plus simulator

40+
Aligned stakeholders

Placeholder . to confirm

01
Fast-time simulation

Network-level traffic study

00
Recorded operational incidents

Post-cutover . placeholder

The approach

Four phases. Nothing was operational until the previous phase said so.

  1. 01Phase

    Design

    PBN procedures drafted against the host country's traffic profile, then iterated with the regulator, the ANSPs, the airlines, and the military until every constraint was answered on paper.

  2. 02Phase

    Validate

    Three real-time simulations and one fast-time simulation. Two of the real-time runs were hosted outside the host country to stress-test the procedures against an independent operational baseline.

  3. 03Phase

    Train

    E-learning packages issued to every ATCO. Approach controllers ran simulator sessions over a two-and-a-half-month window. Dispatchers and airline operations briefed on the same package.

  4. 04Phase

    Cut over

    Phased introduction into operational use. Stand-by procedures and fall-back authority pre-agreed with the regulator. Post-cutover surveillance period to catch anything that didn't show in simulation.

Operating environment

Procedures designed inside live, mixed-fleet airspace. Nothing left the validation phase until it could be flown safely by both newer PBN-equipped aircraft and the legacy fleet still in service.

We needed the whole system rebuilt and the lights to stay on. GANS owned the design, owned the simulations, and owned the training. By the time we went live, the controllers were ahead of the procedures, not catching up to them.

Senior leadership, host air navigation authority

Placeholder . to be attributed

What it delivered

Outcomes the country now operates on.

  • Performance-Based Navigation in operational use

    New STARs, SIDs, holds, instrument approach procedures and missed approach procedures across the host country, ready for suitably equipped aircraft.

  • Headroom for Independent Parallel Operations

    Procedures and sector design now support Independent Parallel Operations at the impacted airports as fleet capability matures.

  • Additional approach sectors in the CTA

    Peak-hour load split across more controller positions, lifting the practical ceiling on managed aircraft per hour.

  • ATCO readiness ahead of cutover

    Two and a half months of structured training, e-learning packages for every controller, simulator hours focused on the approach community.